| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: next CommitFest |
| Date: | 2009-11-13 17:42:33 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070911130942g3c02ca0dq383f3e69ef220a07@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm thinking of something like a Reviewer Hall of Fame, or Honour
> Roll. During and after a commitfest, it shows how many reviews have
> been completed by each person [1].
>
> This could be included in the Weekly News at the CF's conclusion.
>
> One of the things that people get out of contributing to an OSS
> project is the recognition of their peers. Well then, let's leverage
> that by acclaiming the people who put in a lot of effort reviewing,
> loudly and publicly. The louder and more public, the more powerful
> the incentive.
I think this would be a nice thing to do. +1 for considering
complexity of patches in making this determination.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-13 17:48:36 | Re: Inspection of row types in pl/pgsql and pl/sql |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-11-13 17:39:55 | Re: next CommitFest |