Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution
Date: 2009-10-21 18:37:57
Message-ID: 603c8f070910211137r7ed3fbe8hf0375fc3d9e8e7a0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom,
>
>> 1. Invent a GUC that has the settings backwards-compatible,
>> oracle-compatible, throw-error (exact spellings TBD).  Factory default,
>> at least for a few releases, will be throw-error.  Make it SUSET so that
>> unprivileged users can't break things by twiddling it; but it's still
>> possible for the DBA to set it per-database or per-user.
>>
>> 2. Also invent a #option syntax that allows the GUC to be overridden
>> per-function.  (Since the main GUC is SUSET, we can't just use a
>> per-function SET to override it.  There are other ways we could do this
>> but none seem less ugly than #option...)
>
> Hmmmm.  I don't see any reason why this couldn't be set by any user at
> runtime, really.  From a security standpoint, it's less of a risk than
> search_path, and we allow anyone to mess with that.

That's like saying that it's less of a risk than a group of rabid
tyrannosaurs in a kindergarten classroom.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-10-21 18:41:31 Re: Client application name
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-10-21 18:06:39 Re: Client application name