Re: [HACKERS] libpq port number handling

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq port number handling
Date: 2009-09-25 00:41:24
Message-ID: 603c8f070909241741g40d13afq9581e18df8e18b2e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> BTW, are port numbers still limited to 16 bits in IPv6?

Yes.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-25 00:59:25 Re: [HACKERS] libpq port number handling
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-25 00:36:08 Re: [HACKERS] libpq port number handling

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-09-25 00:48:42 Re: [PATCH] Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2311)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-25 00:36:08 Re: [HACKERS] libpq port number handling