From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CommitFest 2009-09: Now In Progress |
Date: | 2009-09-15 13:48:51 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070909150648h2bba53e1ic901d74ac594cb98@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On mån, 2009-09-14 at 21:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> [P.S. I learned my lesson - last CF the equivalent email said that the
>> CF was "closed", which of course was not what I meant at all.]
>
> Yeah, except is it just me or is this "open" terminology equally weird?
> Isn't the 2009-09 fest the one that is open right now?
I can't win.
I believe the terminology we've been using, at least for the past year
since I've been involved, is as follows:
Open = open to new patches
In Progress = working on reviewing and committing patches, no longer
open to new patches
Closed = all patches have been dealt with
So, no, 2009-09 was open yesterday. Now it's in progress, and 2009-11 is open.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2009-09-15 13:54:18 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #5053: domain constraints still leak |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-09-15 13:32:52 | Re: Linux LSB init script |