Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date: 2009-09-14 01:49:37
Message-ID: 603c8f070909131849o51484920l5877d3f233c803e9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I reworked patch to respect mentioned issues. - this patch still
> implement mixed notation - I am thing so this notation is really
> important. All others I respect. The behave is without change, fixed
> some bugs, enhanced regress tests.

This does not compile.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2009-09-14 02:03:53 BUG #5053: domain constraints still leak
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-09-14 01:20:44 Re: Elementary dependency look-up