Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date: 2009-09-14 05:06:39
Message-ID: 162867790909132206v5cfa024ehe29f4eebeb0fab8e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/9/14 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I reworked patch to respect mentioned issues. - this patch still
>> implement mixed notation - I am thing so this notation is really
>> important. All others I respect. The behave is without change, fixed
>> some bugs, enhanced regress tests.
>
> This does not compile.

I'll recheck it today

Pavel

>
> ...Robert
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2009-09-14 05:13:11 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-14 05:04:05 Re: clang's static checker report.