| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Prentice <prentice(at)cisco(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: mixed, named notation support |
| Date: | 2009-08-07 17:33:50 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070908071033k54c86440j6efc231b44a5e62e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> There is definitely not enough evidence here to justify breaking
> existing applications, which is what introducing => would do.
> When and if there's a ratified standard using =>, it'll be time
> to break stuff. In the meantime we can do something with AS and
> be reasonably certain we haven't painted ourselves into a corner.
I wasn't proposing introducing => ; I thought we might want to hold
off on doing anything at all. But I may be the only one, so never
mind.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-07 17:33:59 | Re: \copy: unexpected response (4) |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-08-07 17:32:17 | 2nd Call for papers, PostgreSQL Conference |