From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sampling profiler updated |
Date: | 2009-07-19 04:30:15 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070907182130u405aa202i9472a679015168f3@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine<dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> wrote:
>>> So I'm going to change patch state to "Returned with Feedback" as I guess
>>> we'll need to talk about the issue and find a way to solve it, and I don't
>>> think this state prevent from getting back to the patch in this same fest.
>
>> In general I would prefer patches to be set to Returned with Feedback
>> only when we think they are probably done for this CommitFest.
>> Otherwise, it's hard to tell which are really done and which are maybe
>> done.
>
> What do you want to use then ... Waiting on Author?
Yeah, that's what I was thinking.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-07-19 04:50:13 | Re: multi-threaded pgbench |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-19 04:28:20 | Re: GEQO vs join order restrictions |