| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is? |
| Date: | 2009-06-01 19:52:23 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070906011252o621fad1cqe8b759c36dba7563@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I recommend we create
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.5_Open_Items and start
>> bumping things that can't be completed for 8.4.
>
> Why not just the regular TODO list?
>
> Stuff that has plausible patches attached can go directly to the
> CommitFest_2009-First page, but otherwise I don't see a need for
> special treatment. If we kick something off the 8.4 open items
> list we're essentially saying it doesn't deserve special treatment.
That would be fine too...
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-06-01 19:55:32 | Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-01 19:51:23 | Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is? |