Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl
Date: 2009-05-09 00:05:24
Message-ID: 603c8f070905081705y41fad1feoa8cc20dcc7557ff8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
>> Hi Alvaro,
>>
>> On 05/09/2009 12:26 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>> Perhaps a more difficult problem is that there is no easy way to update
>>>> a single file within a git repo. In cvs or svn, if I blow something up
>>>> on a particular file and I just want to take a fresh look, I just rm;svn
>>>> update.
>>> Hmm, you should use "git revert" for that (same with SVN actually).
>> Uh. Unfortunately not. git revert is for reverting the effects of an
>> earlier commit, not a working copy difference.
>
> Thanks for the clarification :-)
>
> So how do you revert WC changes?  At least I got the SVN part right --
> which is not surprising because that's the one I actually use.  Oh, and
> monotone uses 'revert' for the WC meaning too (the other one does not
> really make much sense to me, but so does git as a whole)
>
> (You can't be serious that for reverting a WC file to the repository
> state you use "git checkout"?)

Yes, that's right. I found that a bit odd too, but it's really not
bad once you get used to it.

If you want to blow away ALL your changes, you can use "git reset
--hard". If you want to remove all the untracked files from your
working tree, you can use "git clean".

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-05-09 00:25:54 Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-05-08 23:00:58 Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl