Re: small but useful patches for text search

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: small but useful patches for text search
Date: 2009-03-27 01:10:40
Message-ID: 603c8f070903261810u12fc998aw39449ba3fe453d3@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> > In any case, the release notes aren't normally a bottleneck.  I still
>> > think that Bruce had his priorities out of whack in not cleaning up
>> > his open-items list before doing this.  If he had done so, nobody
>> > would have noticed how long the notes took.
>>
>> Yes, although Bruce *has* asked for help in cleaning up the open-items list.
>
> Uh, not now;  I put up the list only so people wouldn't think I was
> hiding things, and I said it wasn't cleaned up.  What is so hard for
> people to understand about that.  This is quite annoying.

If I understand correctly, you're saying that you didn't want to have
help with the release notes, you don't want help cleaning up your
mailbox, but you do want beta to wait until you are done doing those
things and any resulting action items have been completed. Is that
right?

I don't think anyone thinks you're hiding anything, but I think there
is a general desire to move this thing along as quickly as reasonably
possible.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-03-27 01:28:33 Re: small but useful patches for text search
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-03-27 00:49:08 Re: small but useful patches for text search