Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)

From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "KaiGai Kohei" <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "KaiGai Kohei" <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)
Date: 2008-12-12 03:11:43
Message-ID: 603c8f070812111911s10041b41l13624845ec41ca15@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This idea allows to compile two or more security mechanism in the same binary,
> and adds a configuration parameter to choose a security mechanism on its startup
> time. So, a single security mechanism chosen works in same time, but multiple
> security mechanisms are built in compile time.

This is a good idea.

> Again, I cannot think it is a good idea to pack several values into a field.

I don't either. I think we need two fields. I can't imagine anyone
making a serious argument that we need to simultaneously support more
than one MAC system: you pick EITHER SELinux or Trusted Solaris, not
both.

But I can sure imagine someone wanting both MAC and DAC.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-12-12 03:12:41 Re: benchmarking the query planner
Previous Message Robert Haas 2008-12-12 03:04:51 Re: benchmarking the query planner