| From: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: proposal sql: labeled function params |
| Date: | 2008-08-18 15:25:57 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070808180825t2caf2d91sbc426206686bb98e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
There may be a TODO in this thread somewhere, but I think this
particular suggestion has drifted pretty far from the problem that
Pavel was trying to solve.
...Robert
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Is this a TODO?
>
>> > >> it's not possible in plpgsql, because we are not able iterate via record.
>> > >
>> > > just add function for iterating over record :)
>> >
>> > it's not easy, when iterating should be fast - when record's field has
>> > different types, than isn't possible cache execution plan.
>>
>> the iterator should convert them to some common type like TEXT
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-08-18 15:44:32 | Re: SeqScan costs |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2008-08-18 15:25:03 | Re: proposal sql: labeled function params |