Re: operator exclusion constraints

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints
Date: 2009-11-05 17:25:07
Message-ID: 5EEE9897-036A-4832-86B9-5CC805B01519@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Nov 5, 2009, at 6:56 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Yeah, we definitely want some parentheses delimiting the expression.
> EXCLUSIVE still feels like the wrong part-of-speech though. How
> about EXCLUDING (...) BY ... instead?

CHECK is a verb; so what about a verb here?

EXCLUDE (...) BY ...

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-05 17:38:52 Re: Typed tables
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-11-05 17:24:43 Typed tables