| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly? |
| Date: | 2016-01-02 17:48:33 |
| Message-ID: | 5E06EB4A-04EC-421B-A12C-64178DD018CA@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On January 2, 2016 6:28:10 PM GMT+01:00, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> A bit of searching around brought up that we saw issues around this
>> before:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4351.1336927207@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
>Indeed. It doesn't look like any of the cleanup I suggested in that
>thread has ever gotten done. I suspect that we'll continue to see
>problems until we get rid of the transient event object attachments.
That'd address some of the problem, but that'd not address the edge triggered behaviour of FD-CLOSE. I think we'll have to abstract away windows sockets, and store the event & state there.
Andres
---
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-01-02 18:00:09 | Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-01-02 17:28:10 | Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly? |