Re: ipc_test

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ipc_test
Date: 2014-04-04 14:11:08
Message-ID: 5890.1396620668@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2014-04-04 09:31:01 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Does anybody care about being able to compile ipc_test as a standalone
>> binary any more?

> I don't.

I can't remember the last time I had use for it either. +1 for removal.

> But if we want to keep it, it should be built during a normal build to
> make sure it doesn't get broken.

Yup.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-04-04 14:19:33 Re: Allocations in critical section (was Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5))
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-04-04 14:10:54 Re: Optimize kernel readahead using buffer access strategy