| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: failures on barnacle (CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY) because of memory leaks |
| Date: | 2014-08-24 16:01:30 |
| Message-ID: | 5866.1408896090@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> writes:
>> I stopped the already running test on addax and started the test on
>> barnacle again. Let's see in a few days/weeks/months what is the result.
> It seems to be running much faster (probably after removing the
> randomization), and apparently it passed the create_view tests without
> crashing, but then crashed at 'constraints' (again, because of OOM).
I poked into the "constraints" test and soon found another leak just like
the other one :-(, which I've now fixed. I lack the patience to let
"constraints" run to conclusion with C_C_R on --- I let it run for about
20 hours and it still was only maybe 1/4th done --- but it got further
than it did in your report and there was zero sign of leakage.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2014-08-24 16:16:47 | Re: failures on barnacle (CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY) because of memory leaks |
| Previous Message | Alexey Klyukin | 2014-08-24 12:11:38 | Re: implement subject alternative names support for SSL connections |