Re: Proposed patch: make SQL interval-literal syntax work per spec

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: make SQL interval-literal syntax work per spec
Date: 2008-09-15 23:42:29
Message-ID: 5845.1221522149@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> writes:
> Is this code handling negative interval literals right?
> I think I quote the relevant spec part at the bottom.

We support independent signs for the different components of the
interval. I'm not sure how well the spec copes with that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2008-09-15 23:50:57 Re: Proposed patch: make SQL interval-literal syntax work per spec
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2008-09-15 23:37:32 Re: Proposed patch: make SQL interval-literal syntax work per spec