| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates |
| Date: | 2015-03-22 09:22:30 |
| Message-ID: | 57F23B9A-A690-435A-94DD-DD8D177F26F4@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On March 22, 2015 6:17:28 AM GMT+01:00, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> Pushed with that additional change. Let's see if the buildfarm
>thinks.
>>
>> jacana, apparently alone among buildfarm members, does not like it.
>
>All the windows nodes don't pass tests with this patch, the difference
>is in the exponential precision: e+000 instead of e+00.
That's due to a different patch though, right? When I checked earlier only jacana had problems due to this, and it looked like random memory was being output. It's interesting that that's on the one windows (not cygwin) critter that does the 128bit dance...
--
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-03-22 09:26:49 | Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-03-22 09:04:41 | Re: [PATCH] Add transforms feature |