Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Date: 2014-05-06 21:31:23
Message-ID: 57E8AA44-F816-45F2-BB61-5A854FFB0A97@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On May 6, 2014, at 2:20 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

>> Stuck on the naming question. I'd be willing to do the patch legwork
>> if we had a consensus (or even a proposal) for what to rename the
>> current jsonb_ops to.
>
> Well, then, we only have a few days to come up with a name.

What are the options?

D

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-05-06 22:20:53 Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-05-06 21:20:20 Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-05-06 21:35:15 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.4
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-05-06 21:26:02 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.4