Re: RHEL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com>
Cc: "Darryl W(dot) DeLao Jr" <ddelao(at)oucpm(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RHEL
Date: 2003-11-12 04:57:43
Message-ID: 5737.1068613063@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> writes:
> I was, a few minutes ago, stunned to discover that as far as I can
> tell, the postgres server is not part of Red Hat Server ES

Feel free to let Red Hat know that you're unhappy about this.

(Not totally unbiased here ... I'm getting *very* tired about RH's
internal indecision about their extent of commitment to Postgres.
I think frequent whacks-upside-the-head from paying customers may
be the only way to get upper management to sit up and take notice.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: RHEL at 2003-11-11 23:03:21 from Adam Haberlach

Responses

  • Re: RHEL at 2003-11-12 18:13:03 from Guy Fraser
  • Re: RHEL at 2003-11-13 04:33:54 from Lamar Owen

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-11-12 05:14:45 Re: plperl/createlang issue
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-12 04:36:17 Re: plperl/createlang issue