Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
Date: 2016-04-22 02:19:03
Message-ID: 57198A17.5020204@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/04/22 9:22, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I have committed this patch. Thanks for working on this. Sorry for the delay.

> Thanks for the push. open_item--;

Thank you, Robert and Michael.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-04-22 02:53:28 Re: Should XLogInsert() be done only inside a critical section?
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-04-22 02:09:28 Re: Fix of doc for synchronous_standby_names.