Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review
Date: 2016-01-19 14:20:03
Message-ID: 569E4613.1010707@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/17/16 9:10 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> but if it's possible to do a backup without
> being a superuser and with only read access to the data directory, I
> would expect every backup soltuion to view that as a feature which they
> want to support, as there are environments which will find it desirable,
> at a minimum, and even some which will require it.

This would certainly be a desirable feature for pgBackRest. The fewer
processes running with the ability to alter the cluster the better.
Even if they are well-tested it's still one less thing to worry about.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-01-19 14:26:46 Re: Re: pglogical_output - a general purpose logical decoding output plugin
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2016-01-19 14:08:43 Re: Advices on custom data type and extension development