| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Gradek <mike(at)busbud(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #13440: unaccent does not remove all diacritics |
| Date: | 2015-06-23 13:42:31 |
| Message-ID: | 55896247.5020909@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 6/18/15 4:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> I think it's perfectly sensible to update the rules in master (even if
>> that has consequences for pg_upgraded databases). I'm just doubtful
>> about the merits of backpatching changes like this.
>
> Well, that's certainly a fair position. How do others feel?
I wouldn't change it in the backbranches either. It's easy to change
the mapping locally if there is a need.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-06-23 13:50:36 | Re: BUG #13440: unaccent does not remove all diacritics |
| Previous Message | Hans Ginzel | 2015-06-23 08:53:04 | CREATE IF NOT EXISTS RLE/USER/INDEX |