Re: generic builtin functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: generic builtin functions
Date: 2005-12-09 01:26:45
Message-ID: 5523.1134091605@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I see in that discussion you say:

>> Every rowtype Datum will carry its own concrete type.

> Are we storing that on disk in every composite object?

Yup. For a rowtype datum it's not a serious overhead. I realize
that the same is not true of enums :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trent Shipley 2005-12-09 01:29:01 Re: [PATCHES] Inherited Constraints
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2005-12-09 00:20:59 Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug?