Re: logical column ordering

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical column ordering
Date: 2015-03-23 22:08:10
Message-ID: 55108ECA.1030705@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 23.3.2015 22:53, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Tomas Vondra
>
> Sorry, the 23/2 one is the one I meant. I got confused over which of
> the emails listed as having an attachment but no patch was the one that
> actually had a patch. (If the commitfest app can't correctly deal with
> more than one attachment, it needs to at least give an indication that
> this condition may exist).
>
> But I am still getting a lot of errors during make check.
>
> 60 of 153 tests failed
>
> Some of them look like maybe a change in the expected output file didn't
> get included in the patch, but at least one was a coredump.

Yes, there were two coredumps (as noted in the message with the patch).

Not sure of the other errors - it certainly is possible I forgot to
include something in the patch. Thanks for noticing this, will look into
that.

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2015-03-23 22:14:58 Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-03-23 22:02:04 Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix