From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: On partitioning |
Date: | 2014-12-17 19:30:36 |
Message-ID: | 5491D9DC.2000507@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/17/2014 11:19 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 12/17/2014 08:53 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Last week, I wrote a longish email listing out the common problems users
>> have with our current partitioning as a way of benchmarking the plan for
>> new partitioning. While some people responded to that post, absolutely
>> nobody discussed the list of issues I gave. Is that because there's
>> universal agreement that I got the major issues right? Seems doubtful.
>
> That was a good list.
;-)
Ok, that made my morning.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-12-17 19:52:21 | Re: On partitioning |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-12-17 19:19:14 | Re: On partitioning |