| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Phil Currier <pcurrier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering) |
| Date: | 2014-12-11 18:54:57 |
| Message-ID: | 5489E881.2040109@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/11/2014 08:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> More abstractly, there's a lot of value in having a predictable release
> schedule. That's going to mean that some release cycles are thin on
> user-visible features, even if just as much work went into them. It's
> the nature of the game.
+ 1,000,000 from me. ;-)
Frankly, BRIN, UPSERT and a couple other things are plenty for a
Postgres release. Other SQL databases would be thrilled to have that
much ... can you name 3 major advances in the last MySQL release?
And given that I've seen nothing about jquery/VODKA since pgCon, I'm
expecting them for 9.6/whatever, not 9.5. There's a whole longish
syntax discussion we haven't even started yet, let alone actual
technical review.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-12-11 18:56:58 | Re: Commitfest problems |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-12-11 18:51:42 | Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering) |