| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2? |
| Date: | 2014-11-10 18:48:24 |
| Message-ID: | 54610878.3060203@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 12/31/2013 09:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> Tom,
>>> There's an abbreviated version of this argument in the comments in
>>> my proposed patch at
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/11927.1384199294@sss.pgh.pa.us
>>> What I'm hoping will happen next is that the complainants will hot-patch
>>> that and see if it fixes their problems. We can't really determine
>>> what to do without that information.
>
>> Unfortunately, the original reporter of this issue will not be available
>> for testing for 2-3 weeks, and I haven't been able to devise a synthetic
>> test which clearly shows the issue.
>
> Ping? I've been waiting on committing that patch pending some real-world
> testing. It'd be nice to resolve this question before we ship 9.3.3,
> which I'm supposing will be sometime in January ...
Did this patch every make it in? Or did it hang waiting for verification?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-11-10 18:56:42 | Re: 9.3 performance issues, lots of bind and parse log entries |
| Previous Message | Eric Ramirez | 2014-11-10 17:43:00 | updating statistics on slow running query |