| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
| Date: | 2014-10-15 13:31:05 |
| Message-ID: | 543E7719.6060503@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/15/2014 01:53 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 12:53 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> Windows Server 2003 isn't even EOL yet. I'd welcome a buildfarm member with
>> that OS and a modern toolchain.
> It's possible to run multiple buildfarm animals on a single Windows
> instance, each with a different toolchain.
Indeed, and even using the same buildroot. That's been built into the
buildfarm for a long time. For example, nightjar and friarbird do this.
>
> There's the chance of interactions that can't occur if each SDK is used
> in isolation on its own machine, but it should be pretty minimal.
Make sure each has a distinct base_port.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-10-15 13:46:11 | Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion |
| Previous Message | Lucas Lersch | 2014-10-15 13:22:45 | Re: Buffer Requests Trace |