Re: Autovacuum fails to keep visibility map up-to-date in mostly-insert-only-tables

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov(at)imap(dot)cc>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum fails to keep visibility map up-to-date in mostly-insert-only-tables
Date: 2014-10-09 23:15:29
Message-ID: 54371711.1060304@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/9/14, 4:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> I agree this is a serious problem. We have discussed various options,
>> but have not decided on anything. The TODO list has:
>>
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
>>
>> Improve setting of visibility map bits for read-only and insert-only
>> workloads
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130906001437.GA29264@momjian.us
>
> I hate to repeat myself, but I think autovacuum could be modified to run
> actions other than vacuum and analyze. In this specific case we could
> be running a table scan that checks only pages that don't have the
> all-visible bit set, and see if it can be set. (Of course, this idea
> needs refinement to avoid running over and over when the bit cannot be
> set on some pages for whatever reason.)

If we go down that road we should also think about having it proactively set hint bits...
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-10-09 23:19:12 Re: Build (definition?) errors - in bootstrap
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2014-10-09 23:11:22 Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition - v0.9