Re: Should we excise the remnants of borland cc support?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should we excise the remnants of borland cc support?
Date: 2014-09-20 14:03:43
Message-ID: 541D893F.30202@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 09/20/2014 09:24 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment there's some rememnants of support for borland CC. I don't
> believe it's likely that any of it still works. I can't remember ever
> seing a buildfarm animal running it either - not surprising it's ~15
> years since the last release.
> Since there's both msvc and mingw support for windows builds - borlands
> only platform - I see little point in continuing to support it.
>
> The reason I'm wondering is that the atomics patch cargo cults forward
> some stuff specific to borland and I'd rather not do that. And I'd
> rather be explicit about stopping to do so than slyly doing it.
>

I thought the Borland stuff was there only so we could build client
libraries for use with things like Delphi.

It might be worth casting the net a little wider to find out if it still
has any users.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-09-20 15:01:01 Re: Yet another abort-early plan disaster on 9.3
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-09-20 13:54:09 Re: Help to startup