| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kalyanov Dmitry <kalyanov(dot)dmitry(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Anonymous code block with parameters |
| Date: | 2014-09-18 22:14:19 |
| Message-ID: | 541B593B.6010500@krosing.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/18/2014 10:40 PM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> On 2014-09-18 10:29 PM, Vik Fearing wrote:
>> On 09/18/2014 10:16 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>>> I guess it proves (a little) that WITH is the right place to do these
>>> kind of things ...
>>
>> I've been wanting this syntax for a few years now, so I certainly vote
>> for it.
>
> I've also been wanting do to something like:
>
> WITH mytyp AS (a int, b int, c int)
> SELECT (tup).* FROM
> (
> SELECT CASE WHEN .. THEN ROW(1,2,3)::mytyp
> WHEN .. THEN ROW(2,3,4)
> ELSE ROW (3,4,5) END AS tup
> FROM ..
> ) ss
+1
>
>
> .marko
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2014-09-18 22:22:59 | Re: Anonymous code block with parameters |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2014-09-18 21:47:04 | Re: [GENERAL] [SQL] pg_multixact issues |