| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Fabris Giovanni Consulente <cons(dot)FabrisGiovanni(at)sia(dot)eu> |
| Subject: | Re: [Windows,PATCH] Use faster, higher precision timer API |
| Date: | 2014-09-18 03:39:43 |
| Message-ID: | 541A53FF.2040104@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/18/2014 12:58 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Oh, hmm, yes, you're right. For some reason I was thinking W2K was later
> than XP. I get more random memory errors as I get older ...
It's because people say Win2k3 / Win2k8 / Win2k8r2 / Win2k12 a lot as
shorthand for Windows Server 2003 (XP-based), Windows Server 2008 (Vista
based), Windows Server 2008 R2 (Windows 7 based) and Windows Server 2012
(Windows 8 based) respectively.
Win2k is just Windows 2000, the release before Windows XP, released in
December 1999. Needless to say, if it's compatible even as far back as
Win2k it's not going to worry anybody.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-09-18 03:49:45 | Protocol TODO: Identify server charset in handshake |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-09-18 03:37:21 | Re: [Windows,PATCH] Use faster, higher precision timer API |