From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bianca Santana Espichicoquez <bespichicoquez(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | denis(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Problems with config.php and non default ports (postgresql - sugarcrm) |
Date: | 2014-09-09 16:03:22 |
Message-ID: | 540F24CA.1040500@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On 09/08/2014 05:27 PM, Bianca Santana Espichicoquez wrote:
> Hello, I've a problem, we're using sugarcrm, and we have a database
> postgresql, but not in the default port, so, when I try to connect
> after I put the port in the db_port parameter, but seems like he not
> recognized, because still pointing to the other instance of the
> database that have the 5432 port, and I can see in that log when sugar
> it's trying to connect, even when I change the port.
>
> Postgresql 9.3
> Sugarcrm 6.5.0
>
> If i put in the db_host_name parameter: ip:port not work either. So, I
> need to know if exist another file where need to put the port value?
>
> I'll appreciate your help. Thanks.
Please post on the correct list. Neither pgsql-advocacy nor
pgsql-hackers is the correct list. Either a Sugarcrm list or
pgsql-general might be the correct forum.
Also, cross-posting on more than one postgresql list is generally
frowned on.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | AWeber - Bob Lunney | 2014-09-17 16:14:36 | PG 9.4 Artwork Donation |
Previous Message | Bianca Santana Espichicoquez | 2014-09-08 21:27:32 | Problems with config.php and non default ports (postgresql - sugarcrm) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-09-09 16:11:30 | Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-09-09 16:03:16 | Re: PQputCopyEnd doesn't adhere to its API contract |