Re: [HACKERS] Problems with config.php and non default ports (postgresql - sugarcrm)

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bianca Santana Espichicoquez <bespichicoquez(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: denis(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problems with config.php and non default ports (postgresql - sugarcrm)
Date: 2014-09-09 16:03:22
Message-ID: 540F24CA.1040500@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers


On 09/08/2014 05:27 PM, Bianca Santana Espichicoquez wrote:
> Hello, I've a problem, we're using sugarcrm, and we have a database
> postgresql, but not in the default port, so, when I try to connect
> after I put the port in the db_port parameter, but seems like he not
> recognized, because still pointing to the other instance of the
> database that have the 5432 port, and I can see in that log when sugar
> it's trying to connect, even when I change the port.
>
> Postgresql 9.3
> Sugarcrm 6.5.0
>
> If i put in the db_host_name parameter: ip:port not work either. So, I
> need to know if exist another file where need to put the port value?
>
> I'll appreciate your help. Thanks.

Please post on the correct list. Neither pgsql-advocacy nor
pgsql-hackers is the correct list. Either a Sugarcrm list or
pgsql-general might be the correct forum.

Also, cross-posting on more than one postgresql list is generally
frowned on.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message AWeber - Bob Lunney 2014-09-17 16:14:36 PG 9.4 Artwork Donation
Previous Message Bianca Santana Espichicoquez 2014-09-08 21:27:32 Problems with config.php and non default ports (postgresql - sugarcrm)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-09-09 16:11:30 Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-09-09 16:03:16 Re: PQputCopyEnd doesn't adhere to its API contract