Re: PL/pgSQL 2

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Date: 2014-09-02 20:48:44
Message-ID: 54062D2C.6090303@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 09/02/2014 09:48 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>> As a case in point, EDB have spent quite a few man-years on their Oracle
>> compatibility layer; and it's still not a terribly exact match, according
>> to my colleagues who have looked at it. So that is a tarbaby I don't
>> personally care to touch ... even ignoring the fact that cutting off
>> EDB's air supply wouldn't be a good thing for the community to do.

What any commercial entity and the Community do are mutually exclusive
and we can not and should not determine what features we will support
based on any commercial endeavor.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, @cmdpromptinc
"If we send our children to Caesar for their education, we should
not be surprised when they come back as Romans."

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2014-09-02 21:08:43 Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-09-02 20:41:29 Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)