Re: PL/pgSQL 2

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Date: 2014-09-02 14:29:27
Message-ID: 5405D447.3010606@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/2/14 4:15 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> I don't like rebranding the PERFORM command, as that would require all
> existing code with PERFORM commands to be changed.

I'm not saying the suggested syntax is perfect, but PERFORM should be
euthanized anyway. Or at least the need for it; perhaps there's no need
to break all the current uses of PERFORM.

.marko

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Tiikkaja 2014-09-02 14:33:44 Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2014-09-02 14:26:31 Re: PL/pgSQL 2