Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Date: 2014-08-14 09:42:52
Message-ID: 53EC849C.2090205@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/14/2014 11:22 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> 1) Why changing that from ERROR to PANIC?
> /* Caller specified a bogus block_index */
> - elog(ERROR, "failed to restore block_index %d", block_index);
> + elog(PANIC, "failed to restore block_index %d", block_index);

No reason, just a leftover from debugging. Please ignore.

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-08-14 09:44:46 Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-08-14 09:41:35 Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)