Re: Built-in binning functions

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Built-in binning functions
Date: 2014-07-18 18:20:32
Message-ID: 53C96570.2080100@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/07/14 02:14, Tom Lane wrote:
> Also, the set of functions provided still needs more thought, because the
> resolution of overloaded functions doesn't really work as nicely as all
> that.

I am honestly considering just removing special case for int8 for now,
the sql standard width_bucket has only support for float8 and numeric,
maybe it's enough for this one also...

What's your opinion on that?

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-07-18 18:23:32 Re: Making joins involving ctid work for the benefit of UPSERT
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-07-18 18:14:34 Re: Making joins involving ctid work for the benefit of UPSERT