From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: inherit support for foreign tables |
Date: | 2014-07-01 07:30:41 |
Message-ID: | 53B263A1.3060107@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2014/07/01 16:04), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp <mailto:fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>> wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but what's the point of using the
> tlist, not reltargetlist?
> Compliance with other create_*scan_plan() functions. The tlist passed to
> those functions is sometimes preprocessed in create_scan_plan() and some
> of the function it calls. If we use reltargetlist directly, we loose
> that preprocessing. I have not see any of create_*scan_plan() fetch the
> targetlist directly from RelOptInfo. It is always the one supplied by
> build_path_tlist() or disuse_physical_tlist() (which in turn calls
> build_path_tlist()) or build_physical_tlist().
I've got the point.
As I said upthread, I'll work on calculating attr_needed for child rels,
and I hope that that will eliminate your concern.
Thanks,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2014-07-01 07:33:46 | Re: RLS Design |
Previous Message | Ronan Dunklau | 2014-07-01 07:23:31 | Re: IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA statement |