| From: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL access to database attributes |
| Date: | 2014-06-21 21:18:33 |
| Message-ID: | 53A5F6A9.2080300@dalibo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/21/2014 10:21 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Second question related to second patch:
>
> Must be new syntax ALLOW_CONNECTIONS?
It doesn't *have* to be called that, but that's what the corresponding
column in pg_database is called so why add confusion? (Actually, it's
called datallowconn but that would be a silly name on the SQL level.)
> Should not be (ENABLE | DISABLE) CONNECTION ?
I don't think it should be, no.
> This doesn't need any new keyword.
None of this requires any new keywords. That's the whole point of the
refactoring patch.
--
Vik
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2014-06-21 21:54:58 | Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout |
| Previous Message | Vik Fearing | 2014-06-21 21:14:02 | Re: SQL access to database attributes |