Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
Date: 2014-06-19 21:38:30
Message-ID: 53A35856.7070402@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/19/2014 10:39 AM, David G Johnston wrote:
> Advocating for the Devil (or a more robust, if probably complicated,
> solution):
> "idle_in_transaction_timeout=10s"
> "idle_in_transaction_target=session|transaction"

Per Kevin Grittner's assessment, aborting the transaction is currently a
nonstarter. So no need for a 2nd GUC.

Also, I really hope that nobody is setting this to 10s ...

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2014-06-19 21:44:24 Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2014-06-19 21:11:47 Re: WIP patch for multiple column assignment in UPDATE