From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink |
Date: | 2014-06-19 03:04:39 |
Message-ID: | 53A25347.1020401@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/18/2014 07:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> I do see growth in the per-query context as well. I'm not sure
>> where that's coming from, but we probably should try to find
>> out. A couple hundred bytes per iteration is going to add up,
>> even if it's not as fast as 8K per iteration. I'm not sure it's
>> dblink's fault, because I don't see anything in dblink.c that is
>> allocating anything in the per-query context, except for the
>> returned tuplestores, which somebody else should clean up.
>
> I poked at this example some more, and found that the additional
> memory leak is occurring during evaluation of the arguments to be
> passed to dblink(). There's been a comment there for a very long
> time suggesting that we might need to do something about that ...
>
> With the attached patch on top of yours, I see no leak anymore.
I can confirm that -- rock solid with 1 million iterations. I assume
that should not be back-patched though?
On a side note, while perusing this section of code:
8<-------------------------- at dblink.c:1176 --------------------------
/* make sure we have a persistent copy of the tupdesc */
tupdesc = CreateTupleDescCopy(tupdesc);
/* check result and tuple descriptor have the same number of columns */
if (nfields != tupdesc->natts)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DATATYPE_MISMATCH),
errmsg("remote query result rowtype does not match "
"the specified FROM clause rowtype")));
/* Prepare attinmeta for later data conversions */
sinfo->attinmeta = TupleDescGetAttInMetadata(tupdesc);
/* Create a new, empty tuplestore */
oldcontext =
MemoryContextSwitchTo(rsinfo->econtext->ecxt_per_query_memory);
sinfo->tuplestore = tuplestore_begin_heap(true, false, work_mem);
rsinfo->setResult = sinfo->tuplestore;
rsinfo->setDesc = tupdesc;
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext);
8<-------------------------- at dblink.c:1194 --------------------------
Shouldn't that CreateTupleDescCopy() happen in ecxt_per_query_memory?
Joe
- --
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=LqzA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Barwick | 2014-06-19 03:09:22 | Re: Possible index issue on 9.5 slave |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-06-19 02:58:48 | Re: Possible index issue on 9.5 slave |