Re: RHEL6 packaging issue for 9.4 beta - libevent conflict

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RHEL6 packaging issue for 9.4 beta - libevent conflict
Date: 2014-06-18 14:44:19
Message-ID: 53A1A5C3.4080200@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 06/18/2014 06:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> I posted about a possible packaging issue with RHEL 6 PGDG packages for
>> 9.4beta on pgsql-yum-pkg, but things are pretty quiet over there (a
>> prior mail asking about what happened with moving to git hasn't had a
>> response).
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/53A10EF9.9060505@2ndquadrant.com
>
> Why in the world is PGDG installing something named libevent at all?
>

pg_bouncer.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, @cmdpromptinc
"If we send our children to Caesar for their education, we should
not be surprised when they come back as Romans."

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-06-18 14:50:43 Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-06-18 14:43:16 Re: API change advice: Passing plan invalidation info from the rewriter into the planner?