Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels
Date: 2014-06-10 17:05:14
Message-ID: 53973ACA.2040801@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 06/10/2014 07:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im> writes:
>> Startup scripts are not solely in the domain of packagers. End users
>> can also be expected to develop/edit their own startup scripts.
>
>> Providing it as GUC would have given end users both the peices, but
>> with a compile-time option they have only one half of the solution;
>> except if they go compile their own binaries, which forces them into
>> being packagers.
>
> I don't find that this argument holds any water at all. Anyone who's
> developing their own start script can be expected to manage recompiling
> Postgres.

This is certainly not true in any fashion. Production systems require a
degree of flexibility and configuration that does not require the
maintaining or compiling of source code.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, @cmdpromptinc
"If we send our children to Caesar for their education, we should
not be surprised when they come back as Romans."

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-06-10 17:07:23 Re: NUMA packaging and patch
Previous Message David G Johnston 2014-06-10 16:57:42 Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels