Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement
Date: 2014-06-09 17:45:18
Message-ID: 5395F2AE.2070306@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/09/2014 06:03 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> One tricky part is that programs like to use libpq for the
>> >authentication, and then they hijack the connection using PGgetssl().
>> >
> Is there*anybody* other than odbc that does that? Do we actually need a
> published API for that, or just a hack for pgodbc?

I wish psqlODBC would stop doing that. It's kind of cool that it
supports compiling without libpq, but it's really quite a mess. I think
we should modify psqlODBC to use the libpq API like most people do.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2014-06-09 17:46:51 Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-06-09 17:13:23 Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension