| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ash <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re-create dependent views on ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN ... TYPE? |
| Date: | 2014-06-02 17:48:02 |
| Message-ID: | 538CB8D2.4020709@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/02/2014 10:40 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Tom's point goes back to what I was trying to drive at originally-
> people should have to ask for this. Perhaps we can provide a way for
> them to ask which is explicit enough that they understand "this might
> not do exactly what you think it does", akin to what happens today with
> a drop-and-recreate-everything approach. 'CASCADE' might not be
> sufficient to meet that, maybe 'CASCADE REBUILD' or something?
I think CASCADE is sufficient; what else could a user mean by ALTER
TABLE ... CASCADE?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-06-02 17:51:59 | Re: Re-create dependent views on ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN ... TYPE? |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-06-02 17:43:01 | Re: Re-create dependent views on ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN ... TYPE? |