Re: jsonb access operators inefficiency

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonb access operators inefficiency
Date: 2014-06-01 23:13:47
Message-ID: 538BB3AB.5070603@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 05/30/2014 01:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> If we're going to construct varlena objects inside a StringInfo, maybe
>> we need a proper API for it. Isn't there a danger that data member of
>> the StringInfo won't be properly aligned to allow us to do this? In any
>> case, we should get most of the benefit of your patch without this
>> "optimization".
> As noted, the data buffer is maxaligned; but nonetheless I agree that
> this is a serious stylistic abuse, and it's not buying much compared
> to the rest of the patch. I'd stick with the cstring_to_text_with_len
> coding.
>
> At the other end of the process, why are we using PG_GETARG_TEXT_P
> and not PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP to avoid a "detoast" cycle on short-header
> inputs? The function body is using VARDATA_ANY/VARSIZE_ANY_EXHDR,
> so it's already prepared for unaligned input.
>
>

Committed with these changes.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-06-02 03:11:40 Re: pg_sleep() doesn't work well with recovery conflict interrupts.
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-06-01 22:33:37 Re: Extended Prefetching using Asynchronous IO - proposal and patch