Re: Bison 3.0 updates

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bison 3.0 updates
Date: 2014-05-28 18:51:04
Message-ID: 53863018.8040203@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers

On 5/28/14, 2:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> What they want is that you use
>> %name-prefix "base_yy"
>> instead of
>> %name-prefix="base_yy"
>> That makes the warning go away.
>
> Oh really!?
>
>> The %something=something syntax is not documented anywhere, so it looks
>> like it worked more or less by accident. We don't use it anywhere else
>> either (e.g. %expect 0, not %expect=0).
>
> Hah. That's probably my fault, somewhere way back when. I'll fix it,
> unless you're already on it.

Go ahead.

In response to

Browse buildfarm-members by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-06-18 15:31:21 buildfarm client release 4.13
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-05-28 18:43:52 Re: Bison 3.0 updates

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-05-28 19:42:35 pgsql: Fix bogus %name-prefix option syntax in all our Bison files.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-05-28 18:43:52 Re: Bison 3.0 updates