Re: SQL access to database attributes

From: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL access to database attributes
Date: 2014-05-26 18:19:09
Message-ID: 5383859D.5080002@dalibo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/26/2014 07:10 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> I don't really object to doing an unlocked check for another such
>> database, but I'm not convinced that additional locking to try to
>> prevent a race is worth its keep.
> +1 on the nannyism, and +1 to ignoring the race.

Okay, I'll submit a new patch with racy nannyism and some grammar
changes that Tom and I have been discussing in private.

--
Vik

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2014-05-26 18:26:07 Re: Spreading full-page writes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-05-26 18:15:26 Re: Allowing line-continuation in pgbench custom scripts